Summary: | catalyst.conf digests should have an "all" field | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Hosted Projects | Reporter: | SpanKY <vapier> |
Component: | Catalyst | Assignee: | Gentoo Catalyst Developers <catalyst> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | Keywords: | InVCS |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
SpanKY
![]() Show me the code, baby. I'll probably get around to this eventually, but it's not likely to make it into 2.0.6 (which will be released in time for 2008.0) if I have to write it. i started to implement it but couldnt decide whether to have generate_digests() do the walking for all or the higher code that writes .DIGESTS Does it really matter if it works? :P If it's ugly, I'll clean it up at some point in future. I assume you meant generate_hash(), since generate_digests() is specific to the GRP target. Anyway, this is in git. This was released long ago. |