Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 20746

Summary: Portage 2.0.48_pre5 & SYNC mirrors
Product: Portage Development Reporter: Narada Sage <narada.sage>
Component: UnclassifiedAssignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers>
Status: RESOLVED INVALID    
Severity: normal    
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 21661    

Description Narada Sage 2003-05-10 10:01:42 UTC
On doing emerge sync I got the following outpu at the end of the process.  I 
think the rsync mirror was rsync.skynet.be.

****
Performing Global Updates: /usr/portage/profiles/updates/1Q-2003
(Could take a couple minutes if you have a lot of binary packages.)
  .='update pass'  *='binary update'  @='/var/db update'
.!!! Invalid binary package: .tbz2
..............................Performing Global 
Updates: /usr/portage/profiles/updates/2Q-2003
(Could take a couple minutes if you have a lot of binary packages.)
  .='update pass'  *='binary update'  @='/var/db update'
.!!! Invalid binary package: .tbz2
.Performing Global Updates: /usr/portage/profiles/updates/4Q-2002
(Could take a couple minutes if you have a lot of binary packages.)
  .='update pass'  *='binary update'  @='/var/db update'
.!!! Invalid binary package: .tbz2
...............................................................................
..
 * An update to portage is available. It is _highly_ recommended
 * that you update portage now, before any other packages are updated.
 * Please do so and then update ALL of your configuration files.
****

Firstly, is it normal to receive all these garbled messages about binary 
packages?  Secondly, there isn't an update to portage so why should it say 
there is?  Here is my emerge info.

Portage 2.0.48_pre5 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.2, glibc-2.3.2-r1)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.4.20-gentoo-r4 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.66GHz
GENTOO_MIRRORS=" http://ftp.belnet.be/mirror/rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo/ 
ftp://ftp.belnet.be/mirror/rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo/ 
http://194.83.57.2/sites/www.ibiblio.org/gentoo/ 
http://212.219.56.131/sites/www.ibiblio.org/gentoo/"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /var/qmail/control /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/shar
e/config /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/3.1/share/config /usr/share/config"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/env.d"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=""
USE="x86 3dnow avi cups encode gif jpeg mmx mpeg ncurses pdflib png quicktime 
truetype xml2 xmms xv zlib directfb alsa slang readline aalib svga java X sdl 
tcpd pam libwww ssl python imlib oggvorbis gtk motif opengl mozilla cdr acpi 
acpi4linux dvd fbcon gtk2 imap maildir moznocompose moznoirc moznomail 
moznoxft mozsvg sse tiff usb xml -oss -apm -crypt -libg++ -mikmod -nls -spell -
gtkhtml -gdbm -berkdb -arts -tetex -bonobo -tcltk -guile -gpm -perl -esd -
gnome -qt -kde"
COMPILER="gcc3"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fprefetch-loop-arrays -
falign-functions=4 -funroll-loops -ffast-math -fforce-addr"
CXXFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fprefetch-loop-
arrays -falign-functions=4 -funroll-loops -ffast-math -fforce-addr"
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
MAKEOPTS="-j5"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
FEATURES="sandbox ccache"
Comment 1 Jon Portnoy (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-10 12:46:48 UTC
The binary stuff is normal. It checks your binary packages to see if anything they reference has moved in the tree.

The update to Portage deal is because .48 is masked and therefore it thinks the unmasked version is an update. I actually think carpaski pulled that notice out for the next release, but I'm not sure.