Summary: | gcc-3.2.3 cross-compiling outputs are ruined by strip-ing for all targets on amd64 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Ákos Maróy <akos> |
Component: | [OLD] Development | Assignee: | Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers <toolchain> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | major | CC: | aurelien.francillon, sven.koehler |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Ákos Maróy
2008-01-24 13:42:51 UTC
Well, i seems it's an issue only when using my overlay, try to remove my overlay from your PORTDIR_OVERLAY and reinstall crossdev, you should then be able to build avr gcc properly i'm investigating the problem, in the meantime you can close this bug as invalid, i'll tell you when the problem is fixed thanks Aurelien gcc-3.2.3 does not support cross-compiling (In reply to comment #2) > gcc-3.2.3 does not support cross-compiling > unfortunately, mspgcc.sourceforge.net suppports only gcc-3.2.3, that's bad, but despite this fact some people find that using msp430-gcc is still more convenient than msp430-as for general purpose programming ... as it's also quite convenient to use gentoo instead of (ubuntu/Redhat/debian whatever, i provide some, yet quite dirty, but usually working ebuilds to make this available to myself and others ... BTW, does mspgcc as such will never went to gentoo tree? What kind of ebuilds/changes would make it acceptable for inclusion in portage? thanks, Aurélien if you post a working/sane ebuild, then it can be integrated ... but no one has done the work, thus gcc-3.2.3 is not supported you would have to convert gcc-3.2.3 to use toolchain.eclass for me to add it Aurelien's ebuilds work for me at least. don't know if they are sane though :) (In reply to comment #4) > if you post a working/sane ebuild, then it can be integrated ... but no one has > done the work, thus gcc-3.2.3 is not supported > > you would have to convert gcc-3.2.3 to use toolchain.eclass for me to add it > I uploaded the stuff, to 159213 which seems to be more related than 207284... Would you consider reopening bug 159213 ? Thanks Aurélien |