Summary: | !!! ERROR: dev-java/xerces-2.3.0 failed. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Voicu Liviu <liviu.voicu> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Dylan Carlson (RETIRED) <absinthe> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | blocker | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
The edited ebuild.
ingore it please, is duplicate of first patch First patch Second patch Third patch |
Description
Voicu Liviu
2003-05-09 12:03:16 UTC
Created attachment 11726 [details]
The edited ebuild.
Created attachment 11727 [details, diff]
ingore it please, is duplicate of first patch
Created attachment 11728 [details, diff]
First patch
Created attachment 11729 [details, diff]
Second patch
Created attachment 11730 [details, diff]
Third patch
Comment on attachment 11727 [details, diff]
ingore it please, is duplicate of first patch
ingore it please, is duplicate of first patch
Is this change of API allowed? Is this a confirmed xerces bug? A quick search on the apache bugzilla yielded nothing, so could you please give the relevant bug number or a link to a mailing list thread. Seems to be a duplicate of 17765, meaning the xerces code is not buggy and needs no patch. Of course it is a bug! if you knew java you could understand the error ( I hope you don't get offended and maybe you do know java ) These classes should be declared ABSTRACT because the instances of these classes are used in an ABSTRACT way...................... [xjavac] /var/tmp/portage/xerces-2.3.0/work/xerces-2_3_0/build/src/org/apache/html/dom/HTMLObjectElementImp l.java:70: org.apache.html.dom.HTMLObjectElementImpl should be declared abstract; it does not define getConten [xjavac] /var/tmp/portage/xerces-2.3.0/work/xerces-2_3_0/build/src/org/apache/html/dom/HTMLFrameElementImpl .java:70: org.apache.html.dom.HTMLFrameElementImpl should be declared abstract; it does not define getContentD See? Ok, I have read the bug number you gave me so why not use these patches for blackdown? Anyway, to be correct java code patches must be applyed. Is possible to attach these comments to bug 17765? I want to know the oppinion of the other people. Regards At first, I wasn't comfortable with the idea of patching Xerces because of a Blackdown compile program. However I have reviewed Voicu Liviu's patchset and have tested Xerces across Blackdown, and the things that depend on Xerces at runtime (including my own applications) ... and all appears to be sane. My thanks to Voicu for submitting this fix. xerces-2.3.0-r1 is in the tree. Cheers Great :-) Right now there are one more package which does not compile with blackdown and I'm still hunting it,....anyway, if java team of gentoo need help and has place for one more gentoo developer I'll be hapy to assist it. Regards, Voicu Liviu |