Summary: | dev-python/numeric and dev-python/numpy both install lapack_lite (and fftpack_lite) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) <flameeyes> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Python Gentoo Team <python> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
2008-01-21 21:29:12 UTC
Symbol rfftb1@@ (64-bit UNIX System V ABI AMD x86-64 architecture) present 2 times /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/Numeric/FFT/fftpack.so /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/fft/fftpack_lite.so Symbol rfftb@@ (64-bit UNIX System V ABI AMD x86-64 architecture) present 2 times /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/Numeric/FFT/fftpack.so /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/fft/fftpack_lite.so Symbol rfftf@@ (64-bit UNIX System V ABI AMD x86-64 architecture) present 2 times /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/Numeric/FFT/fftpack.so /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/fft/fftpack_lite.so Symbol rffti@@ (64-bit UNIX System V ABI AMD x86-64 architecture) present 2 times /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/Numeric/FFT/fftpack.so /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/fft/fftpack_lite.so Not all that surprising, since numpy is really just the next version of Numeric. Really, Numeric has been sunsetted, and all programs that depend on Numeric need to be ported to numpy. Going forward, you really shouldn't see both installed. Hi Diego I am not sure it would have any consequence though. There is little reason to import both numpy and Numeric modules simultaneously. Also packages depending on Numeric are slowly moving to numpy. Did you encounter any package that suffer from this name duplication? Nope, I admit I don't know enough of python to assess how much this can be a problem... any hope to get the old one out soon? (In reply to comment #4) > Nope, I admit I don't know enough of python to assess how much this can be a > problem... any hope to get the old one out soon? > See bug #181653 Closing this one, since we won't do anything about it. |