Bug 206456

Summary:	>sys-apps/busybox-1.7.x compile failure on HPPA due to invalid assumption on signal define values
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) <jer>
Component:	Current packages	Assignee:	Embedded Gentoo Team <embedded>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	major	CC:	hppa
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-01-17 19:44:56 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #201114 +++

This problem is still present in 1.8.2. So let's keep this new bug around for clarity's sake and until the issue is fixed upstream or in the tree.

Actually, the 1.7.4 patch applies to 1.8.2, so maybe it's a good idea to propagate it to the 1.8.2 ebuild. Testing that...

Comment 1 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-01-17 20:12:01 UTC

The patch applies, the package builds, installs, bb still works (even kill, e.g. kill -l)...

Comment 2 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-01-17 20:26:14 UTC

Fixed that in CVS. Now wait for upstream...

Comment 3 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2008-01-18 10:52:16 UTC

yes, i only bothered fixing this for the stable version of busybox on hppa

upstream already fixed things in the latest release, so i wasnt going to bother backporting, just use the new release

if you want to apply it yourself to newer ebuilds, feel free

Comment 4 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2008-02-06 15:15:53 UTC

someone added the patch to the 1.8.2 ebuild ...

Comment 5 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-02-06 16:34:03 UTC

I did, before I opened this bug. You may want to read this bug's description again <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206456#c0>. :)

Comment 6 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-02-07 06:24:55 UTC

1.9.0 does not use the signal-hack patch. Is it safe to say that it's fixed upstream now?

Comment 7 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2008-02-09 22:55:25 UTC

please review comment #3