| Summary: | dev-util/d-feet-0.1.6 version bump | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Alexandre Rostovtsev (RETIRED) <tetromino> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Project Gentopia <gentopia> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | jdaluz |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | d-feet-0.1.6.ebuild | ||
|
Description
Alexandre Rostovtsev (RETIRED)
2008-01-04 05:42:46 UTC
Created attachment 140015 [details]
d-feet-0.1.6.ebuild
ebuild for 0.1.6; the show-properties patch has been applied by upstream and is no longer needed.
cardoe: First of all, the show-properties patch is not necessary (it has been applied by upstream before 0.1.6 was released). Second, even if the patch was necessary, there is no d-feet-0.1.6-show-properties.patch in files/ Third, this is why you should **always** inherit eutils whenever you use epatch PS. Thanks for maintaining d-feet in portage! Cardoe is in the Gentopia herd, no need to explicitly add him to the CC field. (In reply to comment #3) Ah. Ok. The issue is that he had bumped d-feet to 0.1.6 a day after this bug was opened, but his ebuild has a qa problem. Bumped (In reply to comment #2) > cardoe: > > First of all, the show-properties patch is not necessary (it has been applied > by upstream before 0.1.6 was released). I'm well aware. It was simply a copying error. > Second, even if the patch was necessary, there is no > d-feet-0.1.6-show-properties.patch in files/ > Third, this is why you should **always** inherit eutils whenever you use epatch wrong. You do not always need eutils, when you don't need the functionality that eutils provides, why source in extra bash. Pointless waste. Additionally, eutils comes from gnome2 and from distutils anyway. > > PS. Thanks for maintaining d-feet in portage! > (In reply to comment #6) > Additionally, eutils comes from gnome2 and from distutils anyway. I apologize; yes, you are of course correct. I must have made some mistake when testing the ebuild. |