| Summary: | net-dns/pdns-2.9.21 doesn't install development headers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | meyerm |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Sven Wegener <swegener> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | minor | ||
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
meyerm
2007-12-26 19:21:43 UTC
There's no powerdns anywhere... I'm confused. What do you mean by that? I double checked and it's not in any overlay but in the regular portage (and that's great ;-) ). After thinking again I think you thought (thoughtfull, eh? *g*) the packagename would be "powerdns" and not "pdns" (as shown in "Steps to Reproduce")? That's a valid argument, I'd prefer "powerdns" as name too since in the filesystem the full name is used (see /usr/lib/powerdns). But currently it is named pdns. I reopened the bug, hoping this was our misunderstanding. Feel free to close it again if you meant something else. (In reply to comment #2) > I'm confused. What do you mean by that? I mean that there's no ebuild named powerdns anywhere. So please stick with existing ebuild names in bugs. OK, development headers are now installed into /usr/include/pdns. I have chosen pdns here, because that's what the other pdns modules use (#include <pdns/...>) And the point of renaming the package, actually Debian also ships it as package pdns and uses powerdns for directory names. The upstream RPM packages also place the files into /etc/powerdns and the package and tarball is named pdns. So we're consistent here. |