Summary: | app-editors/qemacs-0.3.2_pre20070226 w/ USE=-X: install fails on copying "csstoqe" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | piyokun |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Emacs project <emacs> |
Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
piyokun
2007-12-15 03:52:08 UTC
This happens with USE="-X" only and should be fixed in CVS now. I've put a conditional on CONFIG_HTML around the csstoqe install statement. No revision bump since it is a build failure. Thank you for reporting the issue. > (Why are the previous ebuilds retracted?) At some point we have to clean up... 0.3.1-r3 was removed half a year after 0.3.2_pre20070226 had been added. But maybe you are right and we should keep at least one previous version. @opfer: You had contacted upstream when fixing bug #144081, is there any "official" release in sight? (In reply to comment #1) > At some point we have to clean up... 0.3.1-r3 was removed half a year after > 0.3.2_pre20070226 had been added. But maybe you are right and we should keep at > least one previous version. And if there is no bug report for a long time, we usually clean up. > @opfer: You had contacted upstream when fixing bug #144081, is there any > "official" release in sight? Not really. I told upstream about our patches and if he would like to integrate it and there is constant movement on their CVS, but it is still tagged 0.4.0pre. Thank you for the timely fix. I have confirmed the fix works on my environment. Is it necessary to mark this bug report as "Mark bug as CLOSED"? (In reply to comment #3) > Is it necessary to mark this bug report as "Mark bug as CLOSED"? This is not common practice, but when you ask for it...:) |