Summary: | Emacs package for Portage integration | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Maxim Loginov <Zeliboba> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted> |
Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | emacs, xemacs |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/EmacsForGentoo | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Maxim Loginov
2007-12-14 11:13:11 UTC
The app-{,x}emacs/gentoo-syntax package presently supports editing of Gentoo related files like ebuilds, eclasses, eselect modules, and runscripts. We also have support for ChangeLogs and ebuild keywording. So it is mainly centered on development of individual files and packages. OTOH, this request has a more Portage-tree related perspective, therefore I believe that it should go into it's own package. It will also need more dependencies than gentoo-syntax currently has (and for gentoo-syntax, we like to keep them at a minimum). Reassigning to maintainer-wanted (since it is a request for a new package), adding emacs and xemacs to CC. There's now ga.el, maybe that would be a way to go? <http://www.mail-archive.com/gnu-emacs-sources@gnu.org/msg01752.html> It should be relatively easy to write a Portage backend for it. I've committed app-emacs/anything to the Portage tree some time ago, see bug 385407. It supports most (all?) of the features requested above ("M-x anything-gentoo RET"). Therefore closing. |