Summary: | net-nntp/hellanzb-0.13-r3: webinterface/hellahella only shows a white page. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | account-removed <account-removed-682794b48af> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Alexis Ballier <aballier> |
Status: | VERIFIED INVALID | ||
Severity: | minor | CC: | m.debruijne, net-news |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | Instructions from hellanzb.com / upgrade hellahella for hellanzb |
Description
account-removed
2007-11-23 20:37:12 UTC
Created attachment 136806 [details] Instructions from hellanzb.com / upgrade hellahella for hellanzb http://hellanzb.com/trac/hellanzb/wiki/HellaHella hu ? what did you expect more than a white page when connecting to the xmlrpc interface of hellanzb ? As far as I know, hellahella is not part of hellanzb, and its not even released. The instructions you're showing me only explains how to setup hellahella if you want to do it yourself I thought a webinterface was included, so well I expected it to show something. Did a search on gentoo forums on pros/cons and one of the pros of hellanzb was a webinterface and the other half asked questions about that they couldn't get it to work. So anyways is it possible to change this bug to an enhancement and include a USE flag for hellahella, maybe masked though as it's in development and it would clear up some confusion? :) And yes it's only instuctions on howto do it yourself as I thought an earlier version was in the ebuild. (In reply to comment #2) Sorry forgot to use reply, not sure if it matters. Read comment #3 (In reply to comment #3) > I thought a webinterface was included, so well I expected it to show something. > Did a search on gentoo forums on pros/cons and one of the pros of hellanzb was > a webinterface and the other half asked questions about that they couldn't get > it to work. So anyways is it possible to change this bug to an enhancement and > include a USE flag for hellahella, maybe masked though as it's in development > and it would clear up some confusion? :) > > And yes it's only instuctions on howto do it yourself as I thought an earlier > version was in the ebuild. > well, it'll probably have to get its own ebuild if its distributed as a separated package, and I'm not sure how an ebuild for it should be. If you want to try yourself at ebuild writing, feel free ;) and please open a new bug for a new package and make sure to cc me there. |