Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 198053

Summary: GLSA 200710-12 applies to stable media-libs/t1lib
Product: Gentoo Security Reporter: Richard Freeman <rich0>
Component: GLSA ErrorsAssignee: Gentoo Security <security>
Status: RESOLVED INVALID    
Severity: normal CC: fonts
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: jaervosz
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Description Richard Freeman gentoo-dev 2007-11-04 13:33:25 UTC
GLSA 200710-12 is listed as applying to media-libs/t1lib < 5.0.2-r1.

However, version 1.3.1 is still in portage and has numerous dependencies.

If it is vulnerable then it needs to be fixed.  If it is not vulnerable then the GLSA should be patched so that it doesn't come up as a false alarm.

Do we need to add to the glsa?:
<unaffected range="lt">5.0</unaffected>


Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-05 08:03:10 UTC
fonts please advise wether 1.3.1 is affected?
Comment 2 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-07 20:13:18 UTC
The same code is present in t1lib-1.3.1. Do we have anything depending on the old version?
Comment 3 Ryan Hill (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-08 04:34:48 UTC
No, it doesn't look like it.  I've masked it for removal.

dirtyepic@tycho ~ $ qgrep -N t1lib-1
app-misc/gfontview-0.5.0-r6:DEPEND=">=media-libs/t1lib-1.0.1
app-text/xdvik-22.40y-r2:DEPEND=">=media-libs/t1lib-1.3
media-gfx/swftools-0.7.0:DEPEND=">=media-libs/t1lib-1.3.1
media-gfx/swftools-0.8.0:DEPEND=">=media-libs/t1lib-1.3.1
media-gfx/swftools-0.8.1:DEPEND=">=media-libs/t1lib-1.3.1
media-libs/t1lib-1.3.1:# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/media-libs/t1lib/t1lib-1.3.1.ebuild,v 1.29 2007/01/05 08:35:17 flameeyes Exp $
sci-visualization/grace-5.1.20: >=media-libs/t1lib-1.3.1
sci-visualization/grace-5.1.21: >=media-libs/t1lib-1.3.1
Comment 4 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-08 06:43:02 UTC
Thanks Ryan and Richard.

I'll close this one as INVALID since we don't have a policy regarding older vulnerable versions in the tree.