Bug 197024

Summary:	stable x11-apps/xdm-1.1.4 still installs /etc/pam.d/xdm incuding pam_stack.so
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) <carlo>
Component:	New packages	Assignee:	Gentoo X packagers <x11>
Status:	RESOLVED NEEDINFO
Severity:	normal	CC:	flameeyes, Werner.Peter
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-10-25 12:48:43 UTC

see summary

Comment 1 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-10-25 12:53:19 UTC

Err no, it doesn't. It did, but it doesn't. The old xdm ebuilds used to install pam_stack.so-based pamd files, but now installs a proper pamd file. It depends on when you installed.

Comment 2 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-10-25 12:58:15 UTC

I just reinstalled 1.1.4 before I filed the bug and synced the tree this morning...

Comment 3 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-10-25 13:23:03 UTC

Hm - .../image/etc/pam.d/xdm gets written correctly, but apparently not merged, while Portage claims to do so. Weird. Same problem with dev-libs/cyrus-sasl. Anyone having an idea? Portage bug!?

Comment 4 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-10-25 13:23:33 UTC

*** Bug 197026 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-10-25 15:27:54 UTC

(In reply to comment #3)
> Hm - .../image/etc/pam.d/xdm gets written correctly, but apparently not merged,
> while Portage claims to do so. Weird. Same problem with dev-libs/cyrus-sasl.
> Anyone having an idea? Portage bug!?

Maybe if you could post some emerge output...