Summary: | switch virtual/tetex deps to virtual/latex-base to avoid circual deps with texlive | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Alexis Ballier <aballier> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | TeX project <tex> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | bertrand, smrspam88, text-markup+disabled |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 195815 | ||
Attachments: | feynmf diff |
Description
Alexis Ballier
2007-10-14 21:56:58 UTC
feel free to touch whatever fonts packages you need. (In reply to comment #1) > feel free to touch whatever fonts packages you need. > thanks fixed both freetype 1 and t1lib; only left is latex-package.eclass, I will check all packages inheriting it and we'll be done there. @ulrich: dev-tex/feynmf needs metapost to compile, as I'm planning to switch virtual/tetex dep from latex-package to virtual/latex-base it will have bad deps with texlive. I'll attach a diff to the ebuild Created attachment 133561 [details, diff]
feynmf diff
(In reply to comment #3) > @ulrich: dev-tex/feynmf needs metapost to compile, as I'm planning to switch > virtual/tetex dep from latex-package to virtual/latex-base it will have bad > deps with texlive. I'll attach a diff to the ebuild Sorry, I can't test this at the moment. Feel free to modify feynmf as necessary for texlive. See bug #106909 comment #9 for a test case. (In reply to comment #5) >Sorry, I can't test this at the moment. Feel free to modify feynmf as necessary >for texlive. See bug #106909 comment #9 for a test case. tested and deps changed latex-package eclass updated, everything should be fine now on that regard what about app-vim/latexsuite? I'm wondering whether it shouldn't depend on virtual/latex-base instead of virtual/tetex? Sorry in case this is unrelated... (In reply to comment #8) > what about app-vim/latexsuite? I'm wondering whether it shouldn't depend on > virtual/latex-base instead of virtual/tetex? > Sorry in case this is unrelated... > yes, it might be, but when I'll have added the meta texlive ebuild, this one will provide virtual/tetex so deps will be fine as virtual/latex-base is a subset of virtual/tetex; for now the goal is to integrate texlive, we'll see about tightening(?) the deps later app-text/linuxdoc-tools still depends on tetex? ( >=app-text/tetex-3 ) (In reply to comment #10) > app-text/linuxdoc-tools still depends on tetex? ( >=app-text/tetex-3 ) > I'm on amd64. I'm afraid that app-vim/latexsuite too still depends directly on app-text/tetex, so we are force to resort to a package.provided hack to install it with texlive. Should not this tetex package be removed anyway, since it's not maintained upstream anymore and is replaced by texlive? |