Summary: | sys-fs/udev-115-r6 breaks CAPI | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Stefan Briesenick (RETIRED) <sbriesen> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | udev maintainers <udev-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | major | CC: | mmw |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 195952 |
Description
Stefan Briesenick (RETIRED)
![]() Does capi require one special package to be installed? If yes the rules should be part of this package. (In reply to comment #0) > at least latest udev rules (I detected it with sys-fs/udev-115-r6) CAPI is > broken and unusable. This error occurs since udev-115-r5 well, there is net-dialup/capi4k-utils, which is needed for using CAPI. I can include it there, no problem; it's my package. But it was historically always included in UDEV, so it's odd that it was removed w/o any notice. I will "pimp up" net-dialup/capi4k-utils asap (i.e. this weekend). But a quick(er) fix would to block net-dialup/capi4k-utils-20050718-r1 to -r3 with udev-115-r5 and above. (In reply to comment #3) > well, there is net-dialup/capi4k-utils, which is needed for using CAPI. I can > include it there, no problem; it's my package. But it was historically always > included in UDEV, so it's odd that it was removed w/o any notice. > Well, you may have not noticed, but there was a major udev redesign starting from udev-115-r2. w/o notice: Look at thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/51484 and http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/51750 > I will "pimp up" net-dialup/capi4k-utils asap (i.e. this weekend). > > But a quick(er) fix would to block net-dialup/capi4k-utils-20050718-r1 to -r3 > with udev-115-r5 and above. > You also can block >=udev-115-r2 from within capi4k-utils. ok, I will block it for the time being within capi4k-utils. At least for the current ones. And then I try to rev-bump with added udev-rules. Added this rule back to udev-116-r1. thanks! |