Summary: | sci-libs/vtk-5.0.3 does not declare /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/vtk/ in the LDPATH | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Daniel Tourde <daniel.tourde> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Markus Dittrich (RETIRED) <markusle> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | sci |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Daniel Tourde
2007-09-26 18:59:24 UTC
Markus, I went a little bit further with that. Salome-GUI was clearly specifying -L/usr/lib/vtk-5.0/python where the libraries were in /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/vtk. Once I replaced the path in the right file in salome, things went right. So I removed the LDPATH=/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/vtk I had put in /etc/env.d/40vtk. Two questions though: - Why did the system never found the libraries? They should have been available anyway, whatever the -L/blabla, isn't it? - Is there anything that should be corrected in the vtk ebuild to avoid such situations? Daniel Markus, What about that question? Daniel Hi Daniel, Thanks for the reminder and happy New Year! From what you posted it seems to me that this is something that should be addressed by Salome not VTK. All python related libraries should ideally end up in /usr/lib/python2.x/site-packages and that's where packages should look for them. Does Solome have a switch for this? Simply assuming that the libraries are in /usr/lib/vtk-5.0/python seems fairly random. cheers, Markus Hi Daniel, Where are we with this issue. Still a problem? Thanks, Markus Not in tree anymore |