Summary: | patches to make xfs init and conf scripts more rational | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | James Bowlin <bowlin> |
Component: | [OLD] Unspecified | Assignee: | Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) <azarah> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | minor | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
Patch for /etc/init.d/xfs
patch for /etc/conf.d/xfs |
Description
James Bowlin
2003-04-07 17:33:11 UTC
Created attachment 10344 [details, diff]
Patch for /etc/init.d/xfs
Created attachment 10345 [details, diff]
patch for /etc/conf.d/xfs
it is listed as minor, but this incorrect comment causes trouble, nd this might fix some OpenOffice startup issues (!!!). OpenOffice was completely broken fter compilation on my machine, nd I use XFreee4.3 masked at the time of this writing (so, some part of my system is using '~x86'). Then I unmerged and installed openoffice-bin, and it STILL didn't work. after a long search in the forums, I found some workarounds, saying that i had to change this flag, and the comment was wrong. I came to bugs.gentoo to search if this bug was already filed, and this one here is not the same bug, but touches the same crucial part of the problem with openoffice-bin on machines which freetype is newer than the freetype which openoffice-bin was compiled with. part of the OpenOffice problem is related to XFree not using xfs, because of this problem with xfs configuration. My xfree wouldnt find xfs on unix:127.0.0.1:7100 because of this config problem. 1) The comment says clearly that a value of '-1' means it will only listen on unix sockets, and NOT tcp. MEANING that if you want it to listen on tcp, you need to set XFS_PORT to whatever port you want it to listen on and comment the "nolisten = tcp" line in /etc/X11/fs/config. 2) I never heard of 'unix:127.0.0.1:7100'. You CANNOT have a unix socket with an IP and PORT ... This sounds like confusion/lack of knowledge on the users part, so marking invalid. |