| Summary: | downgrade to binutils-2.17-r1 from 2.6.17.50.0.16 screwed my system | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Volker Hemmann <volkerarmin> |
| Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
| Status: | VERIFIED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | major | ||
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
emerge --info --verbose output
build.log of failing ppp after binutils downgrade the git build.log and bash and the log of binutils-2.17.50.0.16 for fun and profit |
||
|
Description
Volker Hemmann
2007-08-08 17:13:19 UTC
Created attachment 127295 [details]
emerge --info --verbose output
Created attachment 127296 [details]
build.log of failing ppp after binutils downgrade
Created attachment 127298 [details]
the git build.log
Created attachment 127300 [details]
and bash
Created attachment 127302 [details]
and the log of binutils-2.17.50.0.16 for fun and profit
So don't do it. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 184801 *** don't do what? (In reply to comment #7) > don't do what? Don't downgrade binutils; especially not after you've recompiled gcc. I didn't had a choice, did I? And a warning wasn't there too. And if binutils downgrade can break systems, why isn't there a safeguard? With glibc you can't even go back a freaking -rX revision, because it might break something. Sure you had a choice, had you read the documentation and adjusted your package.keywords accordingly. Next time don't mess with package versions that are unkeyworded for your arch. I did not had any binutils entries in package.keywords when I installed 2.17.50.0.16 orginally. The only entry that is there is because I tried to re-emerge it after the 2.17-r1 disaster. (In reply to comment #11) > I did not had any binutils entries in package.keywords when I installed > 2.17.50.0.16 orginally. Sure you did, otherwise you would not have been able to emerge it at all. It's keyworded alpha -*; read the other bug. No more pointless noise here, please. |