Summary: | gentoo sources-2.6.20 - hard hangs caused libata/sata_nv, -- NCQ issues | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Michael Kers <michael.kers> |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Gentoo Kernel Bug Wranglers and Kernel Maintainers <kernel> |
Status: | RESOLVED NEEDINFO | ||
Severity: | critical | CC: | nelson.batalha |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2007.0 | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Michael Kers
2007-08-04 00:23:08 UTC
There is an additional hitch. I tried the 2.6.23-rc1 vanilla-sources to try to replicate this bug. 2.6.23 did not seem to have this problem. The problem either was fixed by 2.6.23 (in the kernel) or is a problem limited to Gentoo-sources. (In reply to comment #1) > (...) 2.6.23 did not seem to have this problem. The problem > either was fixed by 2.6.23 (in the kernel) or is a problem limited to > Gentoo-sources. Can you test the vanilla 2.6.22? > Looks like this drive might also belong in the libata blacklist. Better check how it was fixed in the 2.6.23, could you see if it's blacklisted there? > Can you test the vanilla 2.6.22? Will do. > > Looks like this drive might also belong in the libata blacklist. > Better check how it was fixed in the 2.6.23, could you see if it's > blacklisted there? Just to clarify, its not blacklisted in 2.6.23 (and I didn't have to add it), and I also had NCQ support for all HDs. Just by doing a quick diff on libata-core.c and sata_nv.c between 2.6.22 gentoo and 2.6.23 vanilla, there have been lots of code changes. Michael, Did you get a chance to test the vanilla kernel, currently at 2.6.23-rc5 as of this writing? Please reopen when you've had a chance to test with the latest development kernel and are able to post the test results. |