Summary: | Glade doesn't compile in gnome db support | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Cletus Lichte <lichte> |
Component: | [OLD] Development | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Cletus Lichte
2003-04-03 22:45:10 UTC
I'm using ~x86 and the newest gnomedb and glade ebuilds. the newest glade2 ebuild at that time was way older then the latest (needed) gnomedb ebuilds. Anyway, i dunno about all this, forcing gnomedb seems a bit too much for the casual user. What would be an appropriate useflag ? Would a casual user use glade? I can see not including it because glade and gnomedb aren't always in sync and I'd suggest gnomedb as a use flag, but I'm not married to that idea ;). Whatever you guys come up with would be fine. well i consider myself a casual glade user and i never needed gnomedb stuff (i have honestly no idea what it does). There seems to be no suitable useflag, so maybe a local useflag would be appropriate here. Ah, I was thinking you meant casual users, not developers ;-) Again, I have no probs with gnomedb not being in glade by default. I'm just tired of rewriting the ebuilds to include it. I'd be very happy to set a use variable in my make.conf by hand in order to get gnomedb support in glade. Thanks for all your work! i've added optional gnomedb support to glade-2.0.0-r1 along with some other cleanups. it is not enabled by default. this is a local useflag. |