Summary: | sys-devel/binutils-2.17-r1 collisions | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | PhobosK <phobosk> |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | esigra, kentnl |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | emerge error log for collisions for sys-devel/binutils-2.17-r1 |
Description
PhobosK
2007-07-29 18:10:12 UTC
Created attachment 126371 [details]
emerge error log for collisions for sys-devel/binutils-2.17-r1
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 174184 *** (In reply to comment #2) > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 174184 *** > Having read the rather embarrasing #174184, I don't think this counts as a relative duplicate. Unless I missunderstand the whole metadata violation deal. I figgure it would be more fitting if this bug _depended_ on 174184, as I don't think they're quite the same thing, and this bug may get completely ignored untill the 174184 has somebody decide to do the 'long term fix' ( Goodness only knows when ) I turned multi slot on a long time before the warning was added, and only just turned on collision protection, *shrugs* (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 174184 *** > > > > Having read the rather embarrasing #174184, I don't think this counts as a > relative duplicate. Unless I missunderstand the whole metadata violation deal. > > I figgure it would be more fitting if this bug _depended_ on 174184, as I don't > think they're quite the same thing, and this bug may get completely ignored > untill the 174184 has somebody decide to do the 'long term fix' ( Goodness only > knows when ) > > I turned multi slot on a long time before the warning was added, and only just > turned on collision protection, *shrugs* > Well i don't think it is a duplicate too.... but most of the gentoo people here in the bugs system are so uncooperative that i preferred to turn off multislot and recompile gcc and binutils.... this is a better and less nervous way for me... :) (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 174184 *** > > > > > > > Having read the rather embarrasing #174184, I don't think this counts as a > > relative duplicate. Unless I missunderstand the whole metadata violation deal. > > > > I figgure it would be more fitting if this bug _depended_ on 174184, as I don't > > think they're quite the same thing, and this bug may get completely ignored > > untill the 174184 has somebody decide to do the 'long term fix' ( Goodness only > > knows when ) > > > > I turned multi slot on a long time before the warning was added, and only just > > turned on collision protection, *shrugs* > > > > Well i don't think it is a duplicate too.... but most of the gentoo people here > in the bugs system are so uncooperative that i preferred to turn off multislot > and recompile gcc and binutils.... this is a better and less nervous way for > me... :) > Its kinda stupid really, i turned off "collision protect" just for emerging that package to see what it did, and it installed -r1, then removed the non -r1 straight afterwards, completely ignoring any slotting anyway. so in conclusion, it was effectively a package upgrade that collided with itself. really smart ;) |