Summary: | New Ebuild; app-sci/clustalw-1.83.ebuld | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Gontran Zepeda <gontran> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Michael Imhof (RETIRED) <tantive> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
clustalw-1.83.ebuild
files/optimize-clustalw1.83.patch distribution terms |
Description
Gontran Zepeda
2003-04-03 04:04:16 UTC
Created attachment 10145 [details, diff]
clustalw-1.83.ebuild
new ebuild
Created attachment 10146 [details, diff]
files/optimize-clustalw1.83.patch
for the files dir.
Package is NOT x86 only, contrary to my KEYWORDS assertion. Ok, i checked in the ebuild to app-sci/clustalw. I added a license file: licenses/clustalw and edited the ebuild to point to it. I hope the section i included there actually IS the license. Please correct me if I'm wrong. I masked the ebuild for all archs. Please have a look and tell me if everything is ok, so I can unmask it. Your changes look real good. Thanks for the suggestion of license addition. You're more privy to the practice for licensing: tell me, is it fair to reference the license that's in the README in lieu of adding YAL (yet another license) to the /usr/portage/license directory? In the case that it's <i>not</i>, I'll append the only obvious reference to licensing that I found in the README, as an attachment. Created attachment 10184 [details]
distribution terms
possible license candidate file
Ok, changed the license according to your attachement. I think it's the normal process to add licenses to licenses. I unmasked it for x86. Closing this bug now. Thanks for your help! |