Summary: | New ebuild for Falling Angel GDM theme (legalized) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Sybren Harmsma <cpwins> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted> |
Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | cpwins, hoffbrinkle, marduk, Werner.Peter |
Priority: | Lowest | Keywords: | EBUILD |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
gdm-theme-falling-angel-0.1.0.ebuild
gdm-theme-falling-angel-0.1.0.ebuild |
Description
Sybren Harmsma
2007-07-09 23:02:52 UTC
Created attachment 124380 [details]
gdm-theme-falling-angel-0.1.0.ebuild
See also bug #167379. We are not adding dummy ebuilds to the tree. It's not dummy, it does download the XML and .desktop files, and some icons. I could automate the retrieval of the image file, if thats what you want. In short: how to adjust the ebuild to make it acceptable? What criteria do you use? Comment on attachment 124380 [details]
gdm-theme-falling-angel-0.1.0.ebuild
Don't unpack in src_install, and have a look other theme ebuilds on how to handle install.
Created attachment 124420 [details]
gdm-theme-falling-angel-0.1.0.ebuild
I changed the ebuild as requested. I hope it's OK now, else please let me know how to improve it.
updated ebuild luisroyofantasy.com does not belong to the artist, and the person running it even states so on the front page. This doesn't make things more legal. (The artist's web site is luisroyo.com -- good luck in obtaining permission to redistribute or link to it) (In reply to comment #8) > luisroyofantasy.com does not belong to the artist, and the person running it > even states so on the front page. This doesn't make things more legal. The difference is, is that we are not distributing any copyrighted work ourselves. (Except for the thumbnail, which is really tiny and shouldn't be a problem.) However, we (Gentoo) should consider whether or not the above solution is acceptable. Probably Gentoo has a policy about these kind of situations. Anyone? (In reply to comment #9) > Anyone? Anyone at all? It's been two years. I propoose this bug be closed for the following reasons: * The theme itself hasn't been updated in years * The ebuild is not compliant with the latest EAPIs * It won't work with the upcoming GNOME3 * executioner92.free.fr doesn't appear to exist anymore * No one seems to care |