Summary: | dev-libs/nspr-4.7: Ignored LDFLAGS: /usr/lib/nspr/lib{plc,nspr,plds}4.so.7 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) <arfrever> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Mozilla Gentoo Team <mozilla> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | minor | ||
Priority: | Lowest | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | nspr-4.7.1-respect-LDFLAGS.patch |
Description
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED)
![]() OK, that was about enough. 1/ Use common sense when filing bugs (like, what about mailing gentoo-dev mailing list first and asking about the best course of action here? 2/ If you have a patch, submit it *upstream* unless this is a *Gentoo-specific* issue. ### List of files containing .hash section ### /usr/lib/nspr/libplds4.so.7 /usr/lib/nspr/libplc4.so.7 /usr/lib/nspr/libnspr4.so.7 ### End of list ### Created attachment 143372 [details, diff]
nspr-4.7.1-respect-LDFLAGS.patch
I have attached the patch. We currently don't have any policy that says we can't ignore LDFLAGS. I'd much rather this be discussed on g-dev@ before we start enforcing a policy that doesn't exist. Thanks Fixed |