| Summary: | gtk-xfce-engine2-cvs-20030323.ebuild ( New Package ) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Minati jean michel <magnet> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Leonardo Boshell (RETIRED) <leonardop> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | gnome |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | gtk-xfce-engine2-cvs-20030323 , cvs snapshop of the xfce4's gtk engine | ||
|
Description
Minati jean michel
2003-03-25 13:25:23 UTC
Created attachment 9798 [details] gtk-xfce-engine2-cvs-20030323 , cvs snapshop of the xfce4's gtk engine I didn t find the "cc" fiel told in the doc about submitting ebuild. I would like to know progress for this ebuild thanks magnet@suidzer0.org you'll need to download the apropriate file on http://www.suidzer0.org/magnet/gentoo . I need to find how have some place to mirror the file with a ftp anonymous access. I'm sorry, but I personally don't support cvs ebuilds in Portage. I suggest that you use cvs ebuilds to test packages privately, or share them with others on your personal website or something. It's just that I think the Portage tree should avoid potentially problematic packages as much as possible. CVS/snapshot ebuilds may be OK if they include critical bug fixes or something like that. Otherwise, making them available in the Portage tree is just asking for trouble. Thanks a lot for your contribution, though. Maybe you can provide a new ebuild for a stable release of this package soon. |
