| Summary: | gentoo-sources-2.6.21-r2 reports unbelievable CPU scaling frequencies | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Joshua Hoblitt <j_gentoo> |
| Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Gentoo Kernel Bug Wranglers and Kernel Maintainers <kernel> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NEEDINFO | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | j_gentoo, mbres |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
2.6.17 info
2.6.21 info 2.6.22-gentoo-r1 cpufreq.debug=3 dmesg 2.6.22-gentoo-r1 config patch |
||
|
Description
Joshua Hoblitt
2007-05-30 01:30:39 UTC
Created attachment 120670 [details]
2.6.17 info
Created attachment 120672 [details]
2.6.21 info
Please compile your 2.6.21 kernel with cpufreq debugging support, then boot with "cpufreq.debug=3" and attach dmesg here. Please also attach your kernel .config see comment #3 This issue persists with 2.6.22-gentoo-r1. Created attachment 125305 [details]
2.6.22-gentoo-r1 cpufreq.debug=3 dmesg
Created attachment 125307 [details]
2.6.22-gentoo-r1 config
I'm reopening this bug as the requested information has been provided (sorry about the delay). Created attachment 125612 [details, diff]
patch
If you apply this patch to 2.6.21, do the frequencies become more "believable"?
see comment #9 If that patch does "help", it confirms my suspicion that your xeon can actually clock to those lower frequencies. Here's why they weren't available for some time: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/28/148 |