Summary: | dev-java/antlr-2.7.7 error while compiling: libjli.so not found | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Mateusz Kotyrba <edi15ta> |
Component: | [OLD] Java | Assignee: | Java team <java> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | lrem, phajdan.jr |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
error message
emege --info |
Description
Mateusz Kotyrba
2007-05-23 07:22:09 UTC
Created attachment 120057 [details]
error message
Created attachment 120058 [details]
emege --info
(In reply to comment #0) > compiling dev-java/antlr gives an error: > > /opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0/bin/javac: error while loading shared libraries: libjli.so: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > Please post/attach the outputs of: qlist sun-jdk-1.6 | grep libjli | xargs ls -l qcheck sun-jdk-1.6 biker / # qlist sun-jdk-1.6 | grep libjli | xargs ls -l -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 38270 maj 21 16:32 /opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/i386/jli/libjli.so biker / # qcheck sun-jdk-1.6 Checking dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0-r2 ... AFK: /opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0/jre/lib/applet * 952 out of 953 files are good (In reply to comment #4) The partition where sun-jdk-1.6 is installed haven't run out of disk space for example? Please try re-emerging sun-jdk-1.6. Please reopen if problem still persist after re-emerging sun-jdk-1.6 *** Bug 199942 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Got another report of this same issue. A simple workaround, that I found least intrusive for existing installations, is simply linking the lib into /usr/lib (like ln -s /opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.03/jre/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so /usr/lib/libjli.so). (In reply to comment #9) > A simple workaround, that I found least intrusive for existing installations, > is simply linking the lib into /usr/lib (like ln -s > /opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.03/jre/lib/amd64/jli/libjli.so /usr/lib/libjli.so). > This bug is caused by not having /proc mounted. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 165330 *** |