| Summary: | Wireless network interface switch problems | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Dmitrij D. Czarkoff <czarkoff> |
| Component: | [OLD] baselayout | Assignee: | Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | minor | ||
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
2007-05-13 10:32:59 UTC
Have you tried using preferred_aps=( "SSID" ) instead of essid_eth2=... Also, what is your wireless hardware and driver? Controller identified by lspci as: 03:09.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 2200BG Network Connection (rev 05) ipw2200 driver respectively. No problems with no INIT scrips applied. Why don't you use wpa_supplicant then? It should work better with our scripts and is a proper link manager :) It has somehow odd configuration. And I still would prefer to use Gentoo's default solution. Anyway, neither of my nerworks use WPA, so I don't see a case for it. The default solution for baselayout-2 is wpa_supplicant as wpa_supplicant can also connect to WEP and unsecured access points. The beauty is that as it's a daemon and you go out of range, it will attempt to connect to other AP's you may have configured for. Our scripts are one shot, so cannot do this. Anyway, if you want to try and debug, then lets do it! What baselayout version are you using? sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.10-r4 I have this fixed in baselayout-2.0.0_alpha4 for sure. I'm not sure I want to backport it to baselayout-1. |