Bug 177683

Summary:	net-misc/tightvnc-1.3.9 fails on amd64 patch
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Jeroen Dekien <dekien>
Component:	New packages	Assignee:	Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) <armin76>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	CC:	dekien
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	AMD64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Attachments:	/var/tmp/portage/net-misc/tightvnc-1.3.9/temp/tightvnc-1.3.8-amd64.patch-11241.out

Description Jeroen Dekien 2007-05-08 18:06:39 UTC

when trying to emerge the latest tightvnc-1.3.9 on amd64 it fails on patch tightvnc-1.3.8-amd64.patch

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64 emerge tightvnc
Actual Results:  
 * Failed Patch: tightvnc-1.3.8-amd64.patch !
 *  ( /usr/portage/net-misc/tightvnc/files/tightvnc-1.3.8-amd64.patch )
 * 
 * Include in your bugreport the contents of:
 * 
 *   /var/tmp/portage/net-misc/tightvnc-1.3.9/temp/tightvnc-1.3.8-amd64.patch-11241.out


!!! ERROR: net-misc/tightvnc-1.3.9 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1614:   Called dyn_unpack
  ebuild.sh, line 751:   Called qa_call 'src_unpack'
  environment, line 3123:   Called src_unpack
  tightvnc-1.3.9.ebuild, line 62:   Called epatch '/usr/portage/net-misc/tightvnc/files/tightvnc-1.3.8-amd64.patch'
  eutils.eclass, line 341:   Called die

!!! Failed Patch: tightvnc-1.3.8-amd64.patch!
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.
!!! A complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/net-misc/tightvnc-1.3.9/temp/build.log'.

Comment 1 Jeroen Dekien 2007-05-08 18:07:34 UTC

Created attachment 118607 [details]
/var/tmp/portage/net-misc/tightvnc-1.3.9/temp/tightvnc-1.3.8-amd64.patch-11241.out

Comment 2 Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-05-08 18:20:24 UTC

Please file bugs to the Gentoo Linux product instead of Developer Relations.

Comment 3 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-05-08 20:31:36 UTC

Seems they finally added the amd64 support natively. Resync in ~2 hours and it should work(i hope).

Thanks for reporting.

Comment 4 Jeroen Dekien 2007-05-09 17:31:35 UTC

Thx for fixing and sorry for posting in the wrong category