Summary: | mail-client/claws-mail APOP design error (CVE-2007-1558) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Security | Reporter: | Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) <jaervosz> |
Component: | Vulnerabilities | Assignee: | Gentoo Security <security> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | genone, net-mail+disabled, ticho |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-1558 | ||
Whiteboard: | B3 [noglsa] jaervosz | ||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED)
![]() mail-client/claws-mail-2.9.1 which is already in the tree fixes this security issue. Thx for the note armin76. Arches please test and mark stable. Target keywords are: claws-mail-2.9.1.ebuild:KEYWORDS="alpha amd64 hppa ppc ppc64 sparc x86 ~x86-fbsd" amd64 stable *** Bug 176808 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** sparc stable. ppc64 stable Why doesn't anyone wait for the package maintainer? In addition to claws-mail-2.9.1, following plugins need to be stabilized as well, because current stable versions have API incompatible with 2.9.1: =mail-client/claws-mail-gtkhtml-0.15 =mail-client/claws-mail-mailmbox-1.12.4 =mail-client/claws-mail-rssyl-0.12 =mail-client/claws-mail-vcalendar-1.95 Sorry ticho, my bad. /me slaps /me sparc stable claws-mail-mailmbox and claws-mail-vcalendar. the others aren't keyworded. plug ins stable on ppc64 x86 stable ppc stable plugins stable on amd64 claws-mail stable on alpha. We don't need to keyword any of the plugins as we don't have any stable mark in the one that we have keyworded. Sorry for the late response. claws-mail suffers a glibc bug specific to HPPA where a program will hang indefinitely waiting for a child process to signal back. All versions so far compile, but cannot be used until glibc-2.5 goes stable for HPPA. Therefore I cannot test it and this security bug should hence go forward without HPPA. This one is ready for GLSA vote. I tend to vote NO. no glsa please I vote no, too. Closing with NO GLSA. |