Summary: | ebuild manifest shorthand | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Thilo Bangert (RETIRED) (RETIRED) <bangert> |
Component: | Enhancement/Feature Requests | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | arfrever, caster |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | InVCS |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 181949 | ||
Attachments: | add a "manifest" target to repoman |
Description
Thilo Bangert (RETIRED) (RETIRED)
2007-04-30 08:45:14 UTC
How is it supposed to know which package to operate on? Are you so lazy that you can't tab complete the ebuild name? :P (In reply to comment #1) > How is it supposed to know which package to operate on? Are you so lazy that > you can't tab complete the ebuild name? :P > The current directory? agaffney: i should have added something like $ ebuild manifest expands to $ebuild . manifest which is exactly what betelgeuse is suggesting and. i am not sure, that this is actually possible... and yes - i am THAT lazy... ;) Perhaps it would be more appropriate to make this a new target for repoman. We already have a "fix" target which will do the manifest, but it also does other qa stuff. We can add a "manifest" target that just does the manifest. Created attachment 119669 [details, diff]
add a "manifest" target to repoman
This is in svn r6554.
This has been released in 2.1.2.8. thanks! |