Summary: | migrate blacklist entries from hotplug to udev | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Michal Suchanek <hramrach> |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
Status: | RESOLVED NEEDINFO | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Michal Suchanek
2007-04-11 22:55:22 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > These prevented modules like evbug or eth1394 from loading. > The file /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist (and the directory modprobe.d) does not even > exist. It does exist w/ >=udev-106-r3; and evbug is already. If you have some other suggestions what should be added, then post your suggestions and reason why should it be done here. Blacklisting eth1394 for everyone plain doesn't make sense. $ cat /usr/portage/sys-fs/udev/files/blacklist # This file lists modules which will not be loaded by udev, # not at coldplugging and not on hotplug events. # Add your own entries to this file # in the format "blacklist <name of module>" # Some examples: # evbug is a debug tool and should be loaded explicitly blacklist evbug # You probably want this to not get the console beep loud on every tab :) #blacklist pcspkr # these drivers are very simple, the HID drivers are usually preferred #blacklist usbmouse #blacklist usbkbd # Sometimes loading a framebuffer driver at boot gets the console black #install pci:v*d*sv*sd*bc03sc*i* /bin/true This is the content of the file: # uhci ... usb-uhci handles the same pci class usb-uhci # usbcore ... module is loaded implicitly, ignore it otherwise usbcore # tulip ... de4x5, xircom_tulip_cb, dmfe (...) handle same devices de4x5 # At least 2.4.3 and later xircom_tulip doesn't have that conflict # xircom_tulip_cb dmfe #evbug is a debug tool and should be loaded explicitly evbug # Don't hotplug eth1394, bug #128962 eth1394 shpchp I do not understand the reason for usb-uhci, I would myself think it should be loaded. There is a bug for eth1394 whith detailed reasons. As for the tulip drivers: there are several, and somebody probably thought the tulip one is better than others. I also had to choose tulip over de4x5 for a pci card. oh, yeah, and udev 106 is not stable, not even on x86. As said, the whole content of the file is in Comment #2. If you have recommendations to that, see above. eth1394 - see the bug mentioned in the hotplug file. |