Summary: | sci-libs/djbfft broken static vs. shared handling, bad multilib handling, no SONAME | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Georgi Chulkov <g.chulkov> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Science Related Packages <sci> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | amd64, jakub, sound |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 165629 | ||
Attachments: |
Modified ebuild for djbfft so that the symlinks are created correctly
I forgot to change some things back to the way they were djbfft-0.76.ebuild.diff |
Description
Georgi Chulkov
2007-04-07 07:24:31 UTC
Created attachment 115663 [details]
Modified ebuild for djbfft so that the symlinks are created correctly
This bug is fixed by creating the directory into which the symlinks are supposed to go.
Created attachment 115664 [details]
I forgot to change some things back to the way they were
Here is a diff (diff -Nau djbfft-0.76 djbfft-0.76-r1)
I forgot to change some "ln" options back in the previous ebuild so don't use that.
@sci folks - what's the DJB static frenzy? What a stupid upstream code. :/ If you can't compile both at the same time, the static flag should be just dropped. Also: * QA Notice: The following shared libraries lack a SONAME * /var/tmp/portage/sci-libs/djbfft-0.76/image/usr/lib/libdjbfft.so.0.7.6 Created attachment 115671 [details, diff]
djbfft-0.76.ebuild.diff
This drops USE=static which plain just breaks stuff, plus fixes multilib handling. Tough luck with SONAME, it breaks the stupid thing.
(In reply to comment #3) > * QA Notice: The following shared libraries lack a SONAME > * /var/tmp/portage/sci-libs/djbfft-0.76/image/usr/lib/libdjbfft.so.0.7.6 There's already Bug 158373 about this, removing from here. thanks, fixed |