Summary: | add ECOMPRESS_MASK support to ecompressdir | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Mr. Bones. (RETIRED) <mr_bones_> |
Component: | Core - Ebuild Support | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | darkside, ferringb, jakub, rhill |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 216231 | ||
Attachments: | Add new PORTAGE_COMPRESS_EXCLUDE_SUFFIXES variable. |
Description
Mr. Bones. (RETIRED)
2007-03-28 02:33:31 UTC
Status? *** Bug 232843 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I think we should do like antarus suggested and use the `file` command to separate out the text files and just compress those since generally those are the only ones that we really like to have compressed. Created attachment 163003 [details, diff] Add new PORTAGE_COMPRESS_EXCLUDE_SUFFIXES variable. Add a PORTAGE_COMPRESS_EXCLUDE_SUFFIXES config variable which is used to filter ecompress arguments. This allows the user to control compression of files installed dodoc, excluding files with specific suffix patterns. The current default value includes all of the suffixes that are recognized by dohtml, as well as pdf. (In reply to comment #3) > I think we should do like antarus suggested and use the `file` command to > separate out the text files and just compress those since generally those are > the only ones that we really like to have compressed. I ruled out this approach since the `file` output would be annoying to parse (portable?) and we might want to exclude things like html files too. (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=163003) [edit] > Add new PORTAGE_COMPRESS_EXCLUDE_SUFFIXES variable. This is released in 2.2_rc9. |