Summary: | x11-libs/gtk+-2.10.11 fails to (re)compile | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | André Terpstra <andre> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | pacho |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
portage log
compressed full portage log |
Description
André Terpstra
2007-03-23 07:29:13 UTC
Created attachment 114103 [details]
portage log
Okay, this just worked for me; I'm guessing you don't have something necessary for processing some graphics file type, but at the moment, I don't know what it is. I'll try and dig deeper. I wonder why we have a doc USE flag anyways, when the docs are pre-built in tarball releases as far I know... I believe it just compiled after I gave it another shot. Don't know what was changed though... Because, it would appear that the makefiles are incapable of installing the pre-generated docs. They just bail out unless docbook is available, and if it is available, they regenerate the docs. I think a patch is in order to make it install the generated docs, and not regenerate them. André, could you please attach gziped full build log? The images are not generated. At least I've checked gtk/stock-icons/24/gtk-about.png image and it sits inside source tarball. Thus seems that something removes images... But I can not reproduce either. Created attachment 114643 [details]
compressed full portage log
OK I sent it in as a replacement. But as I said, the build completed 2 days later. André, I've compared your build log with the one I have for normal build procedure and did not found any clues what could cause this problem. If you'll manage to reproduce the problem or find anything which help to understood the root of problem, reopen bug then. |