Bug 166801 – net-misc/vpnc - world-readable credentials

• Product: Gentoo Security
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-02-14 09:51:45 UTC]

Opfer noticed that vpnc.conf is installed with 0644 permissions, it definitely should not as it contains sensitive data.

# cat vpnc.conf 
IPSec gateway 131.246.118.240
IPSec ID unikl
IPSec secret unikl
Xauth username abcdef

[Comment 1 Raphael Marichez (Falco) (RETIRED) 2007-02-14 09:58:29 UTC]

Indeed

[Comment 2 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2007-02-16 06:58:17 UTC]

hanno has sent a patch upstream, we wait for integration.

[Comment 3 Hanno Böck 2007-02-19 21:36:09 UTC]

Now 0.4.0 is in and I'd like to soon remove all older versions.

Security, do you think this is worth an advisory? It's imho no real security flaw, just bad defaults.

[Comment 4 Hanno Böck 2007-02-21 15:52:10 UTC]

Archs, please mark stable vpnc-0.4.0 so we can get rid of the svn-snapshot ebuilds.

[Comment 5 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2007-02-21 16:20:38 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 6 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) 2007-02-21 20:53:33 UTC]

ppc64 stable

[Comment 7 Raphael Marichez (Falco) (RETIRED) 2007-02-23 17:44:30 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)

> Security, do you think this is worth an advisory? It's imho no real security
> flaw, just bad defaults.
> 

probably no

[Comment 8 Tobias Scherbaum (RETIRED) 2007-02-27 19:01:01 UTC]

ppc stable

[Comment 9 Steve Dibb (RETIRED) 2007-03-03 14:09:42 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 10 Matthias Geerdsen (RETIRED) 2007-03-06 14:31:00 UTC]

undecided... tend to vote no though

the account used for my uni's vpn is the same as for mail etc, so it might contain pretty sensitive information

[Comment 11 Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) 2007-03-06 14:35:33 UTC]

yet another no

[Comment 12 Raphael Marichez (Falco) (RETIRED) 2007-03-13 23:03:21 UTC]

(In reply to comment #11)
> yet another no
> 

i agree