Summary: | xfce-extra/xfce4-battery-0.5.0: No display of temperature or fan status | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Ulrich Müller <ulm> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | XFCE Team <xfce> |
Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2006.1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2884 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | Proposed bugfix (patch for panel-plugin/libacpi.c) |
Description
Ulrich Müller
2007-02-08 20:49:45 UTC
Created attachment 109584 [details, diff]
Proposed bugfix (patch for panel-plugin/libacpi.c)
Thanks for reporting but likely we will wait what upstream does before applying this patch. If they apply it, we will also. Can you ping on this bug when upstream responses on that bug in case I happen to miss it. (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks for reporting but likely we will wait what upstream does before > applying this patch. I hope that they will be faster than with my last panel-plugin bug report (which took them half a year :-( ). Please note that this bug should be present on _any_ (ACPI) hardware: The plugin tries to fopen a file "/proc/acpi/fan/*/state" which cannot work, since fopen of course doesn't expand wildcards. This is a regression from the 0.3.0 version. > Can you ping on this bug when upstream responses on that bug in case > I happen to miss it. > I hope that they will be faster than with my last panel-plugin bug report
> (which took them half a year :-( ).
After short discussion with upstream I've applied this patch in CVS.
Thanks for reporting.
(In reply to comment #3) > I hope that they will be faster than with my last panel-plugin bug report > (which took them half a year :-( ). Yeah, that was way too optimistic. Patch has been applied upstream, after almost 4 years. (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > I hope that they will be faster than with my last panel-plugin bug report > > (which took them half a year :-( ). > > Yeah, that was way too optimistic. Patch has been applied upstream, after > almost 4 years. > between this time there has been no upstream maintainer. the guy who finally applied the patch, is a general xfce goodies maintainer, so battery will be on it's own again... |