Bug 164853

Summary:	Rosegarden package interprets incorrect versions
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Paulo J. Matos <paulo>
Component:	Current packages	Assignee:	Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE
Severity:	minor
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description Paulo J. Matos 2007-02-01 15:08:29 UTC

In portage:
http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=rosegarden

There are four versions and two of them show up as 4.1.0, however, 4.1.0 is in reality 1.0, not 4.1.0. Problem is that rosegarden used to be called Rosegarden4 when 1.0 was shipped. Later they changed to Rosegarden only (dropping the 4) and shipped 1.2.4 and 1.4.0. Portage is interpreting rosegarden 4.1.0-r2 as the most recent version, however, it is not. So 4.1.0-r1 and 4.1.0-r2 should be renamed 1.0-r1 and 1.0-r2.

Yet, 1.4.0 should be marked stable, 1.0 (or 4.1.0 as it shows in portage) seems to have a bug with respect to the kernel clock (mentioned in rosegarden mailing list).


Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-02-01 16:11:03 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 152860 ***