Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 163661

Summary: dbus-1.0.2: Please remove <dbus-0.91 line
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Fabio Correa <facorread>
Component: New packagesAssignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers>
Status: VERIFIED CANTFIX    
Severity: trivial CC: ansla80, steev
Priority: Lowest    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: x86   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Description Fabio Correa 2007-01-24 22:01:53 UTC
We cannot update dbus to version 1.0.2 because line 20 of dbus-1.0.2.ebuild (!<sys-apps/dbus-0.91) blocks it. We have first to uninstall our actual version.

Steev Klimaszewski is the author of this change. I could not reach him to put me clear on the reasons he had.

Having this block means that dbus is not properly upgraded on an emerge --update world.
Comment 1 Eric L. 2007-01-25 01:08:22 UTC
When doing "emerge --update --deep world," portage tries to install both dbus-1.0.2 and dbus-0.91 (I don't have either of those installed). Because dbus-0.91 blocks dbus-1.0.2, however, I cannot do an "emerge --update --deep world."
Comment 2 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-25 08:05:16 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> When doing "emerge --update --deep world," portage tries to install both
> dbus-1.0.2 and dbus-0.91 

No it doesn't, there's no dbus-0.91 ebuild. Plus see Bug 1343.
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-25 21:07:42 UTC
Closing.
Comment 4 Fabio Correa 2007-01-25 22:44:47 UTC
Jakub: With all respect, Comment #1 was not the point of this bug. Actually, you just have made a point out of your Comment #2. Seemingly, Steeve wanted the dep to be available due to testing. Now there are not 0.90 test ebuilds anymore.

Then the bug request becomes: Please remove <dbus-0.91 line because the test phase has been completed and the 0.90 ebuilds were removed from the Portage tree.

Thanks in advance.
Comment 5 Steev Klimaszewski (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-26 00:12:15 UTC
No, it is in there because you CANNOT have dbus < .90 installed when you attempt to install 1.0.x - Please see the bug that Jakub linked for the reason why.