Summary: | OpenOffice 2.1: Korean Fonts *too* bold | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Florian Dittmer <gentoo-bugs> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Office Team <office> |
Status: | RESOLVED UPSTREAM | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
Document opened in OpenOffice 2.0.3
Same Document opened in OpenOffice 2.1 This is the Document (ODT-File) Compiled Writer 2.1.0 showing same doc by only2sea |
Description
Florian Dittmer
2007-01-15 08:16:38 UTC
Created attachment 107041 [details]
Document opened in OpenOffice 2.0.3
Created attachment 107042 [details]
Same Document opened in OpenOffice 2.1
Created attachment 107043 [details]
This is the Document (ODT-File)
Created attachment 108568 [details]
Compiled Writer 2.1.0 showing same doc by only2sea
Hello. Guten Tag!
I opened the file with my OpenOffice 2.1 writer. My bold "Batang" font is between the two. Little bit thicker than that of your 2.0.3 but not as thicker as that of your 2.1.
I compiled OpenOffice because there were some font problem other than this(Sorry I didn't test Batang bold problem then. But I think I might have same problem if I installed binary one, I will test it.) I have fewer font problem with compiled one, but I see I have more problems like "help" function, etc here.
Anyway, IMHO, the font looks emboldened or at least not using its own bold font. Batang already has its own bold font but I guess OpenOffice doesn't seem to be using it. It is drawing it bold from normal font with some kind of algorithm, not using already bolden font. If so, the font usually looks uglier.
Yeah, there a differences in how openoffice and openoffice-bin handle fonts, but the main problem (fonts being displayed as "too bold") is an upstream issue, which should be filed here instead: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/ |