Bug 161065

Summary:	net-news/liferea-1.0.16 segfaults when compiled with dbus use flag; could not load liblihtmlm.so
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Eric Stein <eastein>
Component:	Current packages	Assignee:	Daniel Gryniewicz (RETIRED) <dang>
Status:	VERIFIED NEEDINFO
Severity:	critical	CC:	asl, tinaught
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Attachments:	output of gdb w/backtrace

Description Eric Stein 2007-01-09 04:23:34 UTC

Attempting startup:
eastein@glamdring:/home/eastein$ liferea
No browser module configured!
trying to load browser module Mozilla (liblihtmlm.so)
Segmentation fault

When dbus flag is not in use, liferea works as expected.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Commands:
echo "net-news/liferea dbus" >> /etc/portage/packages.use
emerge liferea
liferea

Actual Results:  
Segmentation fault.

Expected Results:  
Started with dbus support enabled.

Installation information:
eastein@glamdring:/home/eastein$ equery u net-news/liferea
[ Searching for packages matching net-news/liferea... ]
[snip]
[ Found these USE variables for net-news/liferea-1.0.16 ]
 U I
 + + dbus      : Enable dbus support for anything that needs it (gpsd, gnomemeeting, etc)
 - - debug     : Enable extra debug codepaths, like asserts and extra output. If you want to get meaningful backtraces see http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/backtraces.xml .
 + + firefox   : Build against Firefox instead of Seamonkey/Mozilla
 - - gtkhtml   : Adds support for gnome-extra/gtkhtml
 - - seamonkey : Adds support for the Seamonkey web-browser

Information from make.conf:
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe"

Comment 1 Eric Stein 2007-01-09 04:24:29 UTC

Created attachment 106149 [details]
output of gdb w/backtrace

Comment 2 Pietro Franchi 2007-02-17 13:41:25 UTC

Does this happen also with a newer version?

Comment 3 Arnaud Launay 2007-03-25 10:18:35 UTC

I wonder why 1.0.24 isn't marked as stable on amd64, I use it since the beginning of january and noted no problem...

Comment 4 Daniel Gryniewicz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-03-26 17:09:05 UTC

bug 159802

Comment 5 Daniel Gryniewicz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-06-15 20:32:40 UTC

Does this happen with 1.0.24?

Comment 6 Eric Stein 2007-06-16 01:04:39 UTC

> Does this happen with 1.0.24?

No.  I'm glad this has all worked out.  Closing.