| Summary: | redhat-artwork-0.63-r1 failed to emerge with: | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Nick <nicks> |
| Component: | [OLD] GNOME | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | major | CC: | tom.gl |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | redhat-artwork/files/cursorthemegen-gcc-2.95.patch | ||
|
Description
Nick
2003-02-20 04:22:00 UTC
Redhat is now using a xfree86 cvs snapshot with "translucent" mouse cursor support in its betas (which is where the current version of redhat-artwork is being pulled from). What version of XFree86 are you using? I was using xfree-4.2.1. Can you give me your opinion on the stability of xfree-4.2.99.4? If that's not a stable enough option, do you have any suggestions for a polished gnome 2.2 theme for my users? I suppose this "bug" is just because I was using the wrong version of xfree! Thanks for the clarification. I can compile it with xfree-4.2.1, but I need to apply a small patch because of gcc-2.95. Modify the ebuild like this:
src_unpack() {
cd ${WORKDIR}
rpm2targz ${DISTDIR}/${A}
tar xzf ${P}*.src.tar.gz
tar xzf ${P}.tar.gz
cd ${P}
patch -p0 < ${FILESDIR}/cursorthemegen-gcc-2.95.patch
}
and save the following attachement in your redhat-artwork/files directory.
I don't think cursor will work with xfree-4.2.1 though, but at least it will emerge and gtk engine will work.
Created attachment 8809 [details, diff]
redhat-artwork/files/cursorthemegen-gcc-2.95.patch
The gcc-2.95 patch.
TGL, wow, thanks for the patch. How hard would it be to modify the redhat-artwork-6x ebuild to check for gentoo or gcc version? IMHO, this would be a valuable patch for us stability/compatibility freaks who distrust gcc 3.x. (I plan on switching somewhere around 3.4.5, in case anyone's wondering) Wait a second, isn't this called a back-port? I am satisfied with manually patching, and if I'm the only one with this bug, then I suppose it's resolved. Thanks thanks for the patch. it makes good sense. i wonder what the redhat people were thinking with that main.c .. :) i've committed it to redhat-artwork-0.63-r1 and redhat-artwork-0.65. please test and see if it works for gcc-2.95 works for me |