Bug 158831 – dev-util/cscope install includes insecure web frontend

• Product: Gentoo Security
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description SpanKY 2006-12-22 07:03:30 UTC]

if we're going to be installing the cscope web frontend, we should probably patch it so the default output includes a big warning:
<h1>this script is insecure and does no checking so you can do ask it to show random files on your server</h1>

while generally not a terribly big issue in the normal case, i dont think people would go around installing this if they knew that it could be easily used to glean fun information about the configuration of their system

a quick test shows that you can display any file that is apache readable (so all of your apache config files)

just install cscope into your cgi-bin (i dont think you even need to configure the .pl file) and browse to like:
http://localhost/cgi-bin/cscope/cscope?fshow=1&fshowfile=/etc/passwd

[Comment 1 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2007-01-05 03:50:34 UTC]

Security, you want the web frontend removed or the big warning?  I will inform upstream about the issue.

[Comment 2 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2007-01-06 13:00:51 UTC]

I think a warning would be sufficient.

[Comment 3 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2007-01-06 18:30:20 UTC]

15.6-r1 with the warning in CVS now, security you now may cc arches if you think that it is needed, or close the bug.

[Comment 4 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2007-02-03 11:44:22 UTC]

Security, all necessary steps from maintainers have been done.  What will happen here next?

[Comment 5 Raphael Marichez (Falco) (RETIRED) 2007-02-10 21:57:28 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> Security, all necessary steps from maintainers have been done.  What will
> happen here next?
> 


The end of the known universe :)

alpha	amd64	arm	ia64	mips	s390 :
please test and mark stable cscope-15.6-r1, thanks.

hppa, ppc, ppc64, sparc, x86, please test and mark stable cscope-15.6-r1 if everything is OK. That is a very weak security issue, so if something is wrong with it, it should be better to stay with 15.5.20060927-r1 and to patch it with the warning in it.

[Comment 6 Raphael Marichez (Falco) (RETIRED) 2007-02-10 21:59:00 UTC]

Forgot to add arches. And reassigning.


"alpha   amd64   arm     ia64    mips    s390 :
please test and mark stable cscope-15.6-r1, thanks.

hppa, ppc, ppc64, sparc, x86, please test and mark stable cscope-15.6-r1 if
everything is OK. That is a very weak security issue, so if something is wrong
with it, it should be better to stay with 15.5.20060927-r1 and to patch it with
the warning in it."

[Comment 7 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2007-02-11 10:02:22 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 8 Tobias Scherbaum (RETIRED) 2007-02-11 11:14:15 UTC]

ppc stable

[Comment 9 René Nussbaumer (RETIRED) 2007-02-11 21:47:39 UTC]

stable on hppa

[Comment 10 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2007-02-12 12:56:40 UTC]

sparc stable.

[Comment 11 Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) 2007-02-12 20:35:28 UTC]

Stable on Alpha.

[Comment 12 Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2007-02-12 21:54:35 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 13 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) 2007-02-13 08:56:44 UTC]

ppc64 stable

[Comment 14 Raphael Marichez (Falco) (RETIRED) 2007-02-13 10:34:21 UTC]

I would vote for NOglsa

[Comment 15 Tavis Ormandy (RETIRED) 2007-02-13 11:14:45 UTC]

also vote NO

[Comment 16 Alexander Færøy 2007-02-14 11:50:01 UTC]

Stable on MIPS.
Closing.

[Comment 17 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2007-02-14 11:51:16 UTC]

Security hasn't finished its procedure.

[Comment 18 Raphael Marichez (Falco) (RETIRED) 2007-02-14 12:27:17 UTC]

yes, thanks.

But noone will vote except me and tavis, so closing without glsa. Feel free to rereopen if you disagree :)