Summary: | app-shells/bash - Strengthen the directory semantics in bash | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Alessandro Di Marco <dmr> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system> |
Status: | RESOLVED UPSTREAM | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | dmr |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
Silly patching ebuild (just applies lazycd patch below.)
LazyCD patch |
Description
Alessandro Di Marco
2006-12-20 16:48:40 UTC
Created attachment 104474 [details]
Silly patching ebuild (just applies lazycd patch below.)
Created attachment 104476 [details, diff]
LazyCD patch
i imagine some people would like this change, but i think that it'd break default spec defined behavior and for many, that would simply not be acceptable i would very much prefer it to go upstream, but i'm 99% sure upstream would reject it ... but i'm not upstream, so what do i know :) (In reply to comment #3) > i imagine some people would like this change, but i think that it'd break > default spec defined behavior and for many, that would simply not be acceptable > > i would very much prefer it to go upstream, but i'm 99% sure upstream would > reject it ... but i'm not upstream, so what do i know :) ...and this is the very reason why I haven't submitted it to the upstream yet - really I have no time to vaste in discussions :-) Anyway if someone would give it a chance, I'll be glad to receive your feedback : comments, ideas, insults are welcome :-). Newer versions of lazycd will be posted right here: http://www.c0nc3pt.com/patches/bash-lazy-cd Bye personally, i dont think i'd use the patch ... i typo things too often and i think your semantic changes would accept it as lazy input :) you could try and find peeps on the forums ... there are always people willing to run just about anything |