| Summary: | dev-lang/ghc license is BSD, not as-is | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Maciej Piechotka <uzytkownik2> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
| Status: | VERIFIED INVALID | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Maciej Piechotka
2006-12-19 11:14:19 UTC
*** Bug 158566 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to comment #0) > If I read correctly on Wikipedia and ghc website it's BSD License not as-it. Really? http://www.haskell.org/ghc/license.html *** Bug 158568 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 1. Sorry for click refresh few times by accident (I think it was show bug not add bug - and I saw somebody responded). However there is no reason to call me dupe - I don't mention to spam and you marked it as duplicate faster. 2. See text of BSD License (they replace <organisation> by "Univercity" and I see no difference (I've checked on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_license and file:///usr/portage/licenses/BSD) (In reply to comment #4) > However there is no reason to call me dupe LOL? dupe == duplicate bug (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > However there is no reason to call me dupe > > LOL? dupe == duplicate bug > Sorry - I misunderstood. Can I ask what's difference betwan ghc license and bsd license? |
