Summary: | Link to file, but file missing (404) in Gentoo Security Guide | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [OLD] Docs-user | Reporter: | Vince Verleye <zu> |
Component: | Gentoo Security Guide | Assignee: | Sven Vermeulen (RETIRED) <swift> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | kn, zhen |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/firewall.gz | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Vince Verleye
2003-02-12 17:51:10 UTC
plz specify which line or which section. i couldn't find it seo: just search for it in the doc (security-howto). I know that we had this on the old site, and it prolly just needs moved in cvs. zhen; it is not in cvs any more. i made the firewall.gz file and i am not sure where i could put in in cvs.. it is just a text file tar gziped. seo: You can find it here, if not found already: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-security.xml#doc_chap6 Please also consider checking this line near the end of the script (are you the editor, seo?): ---------8<----------- #Allow client to route through via NAT (Network Address Translation) $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $IINTERFACE -j MASQUERADE ---------8<----------- I could be wrong since I'm not too familiar with iptables, but in my setup I have to replace $IINTERFACE by $OINTERFACE for it to work correctly. Like this: $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $OINTERFACE -j MASQUERADE Thanks in advance. vince thanks.. i found where the link was broken kn@insecurigy.dk ; could you possibly revise what vince said? Sure. It really depends on what you think is the outside and inside of your network. If $IINTERFACE is the inside of your network (In the example 10.0.0.) this is the one to MASQ. You don't want to MASQ the internet to your local network :) When I have the time I'm going to rewrite the firewall part with some automatic blocking of ISP from http://isc.incidents.org/ Anyway hopes this answars your question. I'm looking forward to your rewriting of the firewall. Sure, it makes sense somehow, but like I said, I'm not too familiar with iptables. I thought -o is --out-interface so naturally I'd use $OINTERFACE. what is the status on this bug? Seo doesn't seem active. I'm taking his bugs... This has been fixed previously. |