Bug 15510

Summary:	Portage no longer setting correct date in log filename
Product:	Portage Development	Reporter:	Matt Caesar <caesarm>
Component:	Unclassified	Assignee:	Nicholas Jones (RETIRED) <carpaski>
Status:	RESOLVED INVALID
Severity:	normal
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description Matt Caesar 2003-02-11 15:11:31 UTC

An upgrade of portage-2.0.46-r12 broke the date filestamp in the filenames of
the logs stored under PORT_LOGDIR. Here is a sample of the files in my log
directory. Note that the only correct date is for the portage file stamp. I
changed the directory of my log files just before emerging the new portage which
is why there is only one correct filename in the following list.

hotrod log # ls -lrtc /var/log/emerge
total 724
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         2772 Feb  8 08:18 30208-portage-2.0.46-r12.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root         1339 Feb  8 08:19 -portage-2.0.46-r12.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb  8 08:19 -portage-2.0.46-r11.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb  8 08:30 -mirrorselect-0.1-r1.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root          233 Feb  8 08:30 912-mirrorselect-0.1-r1.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root          488 Feb  8 08:44 916-realplayer-8-r5.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root           12 Feb  8 08:46 -realplayer-8-r5.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root          467 Feb  8 08:46 917-realplayer-8-r5.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            8 Feb  8 08:47 917-realplayer-8-r4.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 18:40 -gnome-applets-2.0.4.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 18:41 -gnome-panel-2.0.11.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 18:41 -gnome-panel-1.4.2-r1.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 18:41 -gnome-desktop-2.0.10.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 18:42 -gnome-libs-1.4.2.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 18:45 -gnome-session-2.0.9.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 18:45 -gnome-vfs-1.0.5-r3.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 18:45 -gnome-vfs-2.0.4.1-r1.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 18:45 -gnome-print-0.35-r3.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 19:34 -gnome-themes-0.3.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 22:54 -groff-1.18.1-r1.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root       163863 Feb 10 23:08 919-groff-1.18.1-r1.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 23:08 919-groff-1.18.1.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 23:08 919-intltool-0.25.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root        10436 Feb 10 23:09 921-intltool-0.25.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 23:09 921-intltool-0.22.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 23:09 921-gtk-doc-1.0.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root         4519 Feb 10 23:09 923-gtk-doc-1.0.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 23:09 923-gtk-doc-0.9-r2.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root            0 Feb 10 23:09 923-gnome-libs-1.4.2.log
-rw-rw-r--    1 root     root       521255 Feb 10 23:51 925-gnome-libs-1.4.2.log

-Matt

Comment 1 Nicholas Jones (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2003-02-12 10:23:11 UTC

Not broken. Sort them. They're in compile order now.