Summary: | cleaner handling of $T | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | SpanKY <vapier> |
Component: | Core - Ebuild Support | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | sam |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
SpanKY
2006-10-23 01:09:07 UTC
btw, i'm not saying the variable we use internally should be named the same as what we export to ebuilds ... i imagine it'd be a huge pain to distinguish between $T when reading/working with portage code perhaps we now have three vars (none named $T) for use internally and we just export the properly one as $T when invoking the ebuild code Well, if you can cook up a patch for it ... |