Summary: | module-init-tools-3.2.2-r1 fails to compile with -combine in CFLAGS | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Felix Leimbach <felix.leimbach> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
Status: | VERIFIED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | peter |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2006.1 | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Felix Leimbach
2006-09-26 12:02:56 UTC
So don't use it. Ya I got that far, too :-) Just wanted to point out that it is a canditate for filter-flags. It would surely make the experience for gentoo users using this compiler flag smoother. I for one decided to try it after reading a detailed post by Duncan about his choice of CFLAGS on the gentoo.amd64 newsgroup: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.amd64/8924/match=gcc+4+1+upgrade+bad+desktop+interactivity+combine Following this thread some more people decided to try it, as can be seen here: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.amd64/9049/match=gcc4+1+upgrade+duncan+s+flags Feel free to close the bug if you feel it's not worth it. Thanks Considering that bugzilla search returns exactly 3 bugs w/ emerge --info using this flag, I don't think this it worth filtering. *** Bug 149300 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to comment #3) > Considering that bugzilla search returns exactly 3 bugs w/ emerge --info using > this flag, I don't think this it worth filtering. > I think you'll get a few more now that Duncan has publicised the flag on gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org. Before raising my bug 149300, of course I searched for bugs on module-init-tools but this one didn't show up. Sorry for the duplication. (In reply to comment #5) > I think you'll get a few more now that Duncan has publicised the flag on > gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org. Then go bug Duncan. ;) |