Summary: | idea how to reduce portage ebuild count and allow customly built solutions/packs of ebuilds | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Romans <romans> |
Component: | Core | Assignee: | Nicholas Jones (RETIRED) <carpaski> |
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | vapier |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2.0 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | ebuilds to create ready-to-use qmail multidomain solution. |
Description
Romans
2003-01-31 16:55:04 UTC
umm what exactly are you proposing ? Create a new category portage-extensions. That would be exact place for my e-builds (they are attached to bug), which build multidomain qmail server(from original description). Then someone might want to create there ebuild to reproduce http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/virt-mail-howto.xml (Virtual mailgosting with postfix). Courier have a lot of components which could be put alltogether in the extention pack. Games or emacs or sys-cluster could be moved outside of portage into extention packs, since not much use them but they produce much noice during rsync. Created attachment 7860 [details]
ebuilds to create ready-to-use qmail multidomain solution.
Looks like you're suggesting PORTAGE_OVERLAY... If you have a good explanation that doesn't end up being PORTAGE_OVERLAY, reopen. |